Iconic language
(descriptive; close reading)
- Take a census of visuals used in first 40 pages of three
texts (What is it made of? What does it contain worth explaining?
- Photographs
- Representative speakers
- Celebrities
- Cultural representations (landscapes, architecture,
festivals, art, etc.)
- General human interaction
- Representative genres (ads, posters, schedules, etc.)
- Thumbnails
- Background
- Line drawings
- Cartoons with dialogue
- Classification (i.e. scenes or things that are labeled with
vocabulary)
- Concepts
- Maps
- Use Kress and van Leeuwen’s framework for examining
representative visuals of first two tlypes, above (What do you see in the
artefact?)
- Narrative representations
- Conceptual representations
- Position of and interaction with viewer
- Context of layout
The cultural language
(links to larger culture/social context)
- Consider
the layout and how representative visuals are being used (What is the context?)
- What
appears to be the pedagogical purpose?
- What
cultural allusions are being made?
- What
universal (i.e. shared human values) are being evoked?
- Briefly
define the audience, in this case is pretty straightforward (Who is the
audience?)
- The
audience is university students in the United States, probably native speakers
of English, and culturally mainstream.
Assumed to be 18-22 years of age.
(Visuals reinforce this)
The theoretical
language (stance; lens for understanding)
- What
do the findings reveal about how visuals are used in language pedagogy? (What does it mean? How do we interpret it?)
- Do
the visuals leverage cultural stereotypes to make meaning more predictable and
therefore, enhance language learning? In
what ways, might this be a positive or negative thing?
- What
does this say about disciplinary differences in the use of visuals in
textbooks?
- What
does this say about how visuals represent linguistic concepts at all? (Nowhere is this more straightforward, after
all, than in a language textbook.)
Artifact: Sample page and partial analysis
- This is a line drawing, a variation of cartoon with dialogue. Notice that the purpose is to construct the situation in which the dialogue, above the pictures, would occur.
- Notice the interaction between participants within the picture. In Kress and van Leeuwen's terms there is a transactional reaction in both scenes. That this should be the case is highly appropriate for a verbal dialogue between multiple participants, as in a language textbook.
- Notice that in both cases there is a small image of a house framed within, in the first picture, a computer screen, and in the second, a cell phone. Not only does this establish the topic of the conversation in a very concrete way, but it can be assumed to appeal to the target audience, for whom images on a screen such as these would a normal conversation starter.
You've made excellent use of this assignment to do some sound ground work on your project :)
ReplyDeleteHi Laurie! What an interesting project, to analyze the visuals in language textbooks. I'm curious particularly about the theoretical portion of your heuristic. While you bring up one of Kress & Van Leeweun's terms about transactional reaction, I'm left wondering how you interpret that. If it is an instance of it, what does it mean? And what cultural stereotypes are in play in these pictures? And why point out the home? the computer screen? the cell phone? What meaning is made?
ReplyDelete